Skip to main content Skip to footer

Here's a number worth sitting with: at any given moment, around 95% of your potential buyers are not in the market.

They're not ignoring you. They're not unconvinced. They're just not ready yet.

So what's the other 95% of your marketing budget actually doing for them?

For most B2B businesses, the honest answer is: not much.

Key takeaways

  • At any given moment, around 95% of your potential buyers are not ready to buy 

  • Most B2B budgets are over-indexed on lead generation and under-indexed on demand generation

  • Lead generation captures existing demand. Demand generation creates it

  • By the time someone fills in your form, their impression of your brand is already formed

  • The brands that are hardest to displace have been building familiarity long before buyers were ready 

  • As a rough starting point invest 60% in brand and demand, and 40% in short-term lead capture

The problem with chasing hand-raisers

The default in B2B marketing is to go after people who are already looking. The form fillers. The ad clickers. The eBook downloaders.

And it makes sense. They're visible. They're measurable. They feel like progress.

But they're also a tiny, fiercely contested minority. Every competitor in your space is chasing the same 5%, with the same tactics, often with the same message. 

On fact, 68% of b2b buyers say vendors all sound identical.

Meanwhile, the 95% who will be your future buyers are forming impressions of your brand. Or not forming them. Depending on whether you showed up.

We often come across clients who are investing heavily in lead generation. But rare is the client following this strategy who feels they’re getting a good return – if any actually that makes a dramatic difference.

Why budgets end up in the wrong place

It's not blind optimism. It comes down to measurement.

Lead generation is easy to track. Form fills. Cost per lead. MQLs handed to sales. 

These are all clean numbers which are easy to report and investment feels like it’s accountable.

Demand generation is harder to measure. Brand awareness. Share of voice. Whether someone remembers your name when a problem lands on their desk six months from now. These are real things which compound over time, but they don't show up neatly in a dashboard.

So budgets follow the metrics. And the metrics point to lead gen.

As a result, B2B marketing typically talks to a fraction of its potential market, while largely ignoring the rest.

Two different jobs, both worth doing

Lead generation and demand generation are not the same thing, and they're not competing.

Lead generation captures buyers who are already in the market. 

Demand generation builds the familiarity and preference that means when those buyers come to market, you're already the obvious choice.

One fills the pipeline now. The other cultivates it for later.

The problem isn't lead generation. It's treating lead generation as the whole job.

By the time someone fills in your form, the decision about whether you're worth their time has largely already been made. 

Buying groups typically comprise six to ten stakeholders, each consuming multiple pieces of content before a typical B2B purchase decision is reached. They weren't waiting for your gated report. They were forming impressions of your brand long before they raised their hand.

Demand generation is what shapes that impression before the form ever appears.

What good demand generation actually looks like

Demand generation is consistent, always-on brand marketing that reaches buyers long before they're ready to act.

It means showing up where your audience is, with ideas worthy of their attention.

It means having a point of view, not just a service list.

It means accepting that some of your best marketing will not produce an MQL this month. And that's exactly the point.

The brands that are hardest to displace are the ones that have been building familiarity for years. The ones where, when a buyer finally comes to market, there's no real consideration set. There's just the obvious choice.

So where should you start?

You don't need to abandon lead generation. You need to fund demand generation properly alongside it.

A rough starting point: I recommend putting 60% of budget toward long-term brand and demand, 40% toward short-term lead capture and activation. The right balance depends on how established your brand already is, but if demand generation is getting nothing, or a token slice, the balance is probably wrong.

Three questions worth asking:

Where is the majority of your budget going right now? If it's mostly paid search, gated content and outbound, you're probably over-indexed on capturing existing demand rather than creating new demand.

What are you doing to reach buyers who aren't looking yet? Not everyone is in research mode. The ones who aren't are your future pipeline. What does your brand look like to them today?

Are you consistent? The most common demand generation mistake is treating it like a campaign. Running it for just a quarter, seeing no immediate leads spike and pulling the budget. Brand awareness builds slowly. The brands that benefit most are the ones that kept going before it felt like it was working.

The bottom line

Most B2B marketing budgets are optimised for right now. For the 5% who are ready to buy today.

That's not a targeting problem but a strategy problem.

The fix isn't complicated, you just need to fund demand generation properly. Be consistent and accept that some of the most valuable marketing you do won't show up in this month's report.

The brands that understand this early are the ones that find, when the market shifts, they're already where buyers are looking.

Think your marketing might be too focused on the 5%?

Let's talk about building demand that works before buyers are ready. Get in touch or find out more about our demand generation work.

FAQs

What is the 95/5 rule in B2B marketing?

Research from the Ehrenberg-Bass Institute shows that at any given moment, only around 5% of B2B buyers are actively in the market. Effective marketing needs to reach both groups, not just the ones ready to buy today.

What is the difference between demand generation and lead generation?

Lead generation captures buyers who are already looking. Demand generation builds awareness and preference before buyers are ready, so when they do enter the market, you are already familiar and trusted. Both matter. The mistake is funding only one.

Why do most B2B marketing budgets focus on lead generation?

Because lead generation is easier to measure. Form fills, cost per lead and MQLs are clean, reportable numbers. Demand generation works over a longer timeframe and is harder to attribute directly, so it tends to lose out in budget conversations even when it drives more long-term growth.

How much should a B2B business spend on demand generation?

A common benchmark is 60% toward long-term brand and demand generation, 40% toward short-term lead capture. The right split depends on how established your brand already is.

How do you measure demand generation?

Harder than measuring lead generation, which is partly why it gets underfunded. Useful indicators include brand awareness, share of voice, direct traffic growth and the proportion of inbound leads that already know who you are before they get in touch.

This site uses cookies

Peanut butter. Choco chip. Cranberry. Oat. Raisin. Cookies, we love them. (Someone let the copywriter freewheel on this one). Alas, these data cookies aren’t the doughy ones. While they’re not the snooping kind that lay the crumbs to follow you around the web, we may use the data they trail to help us improve this site for visitors like you. You can thumbs-up. Or if you’re so inclined, relive the end for Maximus, and give them a thumbs down.